On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Crimes aside, I'm trying to decide if non-player ownership (and ability > to act on behalf of the golem) is a bug or feature, especially if > we're contemplating voting golems...
I've always thought that non-player participation (and partnerships in general) make for a fun warping of the rules.
