On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Sean Hunt <scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > Thought: Do not allow on arbitrary slave golems. Create a new class of > vote-eligible golems with more restricted creation rules.
Meh. I don't want to force people to create Golems with game mechanics that require using one to achieve the maximum possible voting limit*, and the only real alternative is requiring people to give up their own votes, which is already possible with Promises and generally not fun. Restrictions also tend to be onerous, and rubles really are well capped. *not that almost any proposals are controversial enough for people to bother buying votes, as has been amply proven with different systems, but the idea is fun enough that we can keep pretending. Actually, allowing larger voting limit increases might be useful encouragement, although I guess we should get a version of Support Democracy back to avoid scams.
