On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 13:32, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> On 25 January 2012 18:57, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Proposal Human Point Two, Morendil, Steve (x3), Andre
> (x3),
> >> ais523 (x2), Canada, Bucky, G., omd, woggle,
> >> Spitemaster, allispaul, Yally, BobTHJ, Murphy,
> Tiger,
> >> scshunt, Andon
> > Various: Have a proposal adopted specifying that someone wins
> (always
> > generally possible at some power or other; currently
> requires a
> > Rule change of R2343).
>
> I don't remember what proposal this was. It wasn't my work personally
> I think, so does anyone remember being my accomplice?
>
> /Tiger
>
>
> I believe the most significant propsal win was when G. submitted a series of
> proposals
> that would give a win to different players based upon their current chamber,
> but they
> then all passed, so every active player won the game.
Yep, the following subset were from the "universal proposal" win, a massive
display
of either pathetic apathy or an uninteresting voting system demonstrated in
proposals
6683-6685 (05-Apr-2010):
UNIVERSAL PROP. G., comex, ais523, woggle, Spitemaster, allispaul,
Yally, BobTHJ, Murphy, Tiger, coppro, Andon
