On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 19:09, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:53 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> Meanwhile, I submit a criminal CFJ: Pavitra broke rule 2338 by cashing a >> promise with insufficient context. > > Proposal: eep (AI=3) > > Amend Rule 2338 (Cashing Promises) by replacing "MUST" with "must". > > [This is clearly supposed to be a hard requirement, not a crime.] > >
Why not just make the action INEFFECTIVE if there is insufficient context? Sean
