On 11/07/2011 06:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> scshunt wrote:
>
>> Proposal: What? (AI=1)
>> {{{
>> Repeal Rule 2353 (The Conductor).
>> [All switches must be tracked]
>> }}}
>
> The point is, if we create a new switch and a new officer, but forget
> to specify that the latter tracks the former (this has actually
> happened at least once), then R2353 prevents R2162(c) from declaring
> that the new thing-intended-to-be-a-switch isn't actually a switch.Why did we create this rule in the first place?
