On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Judge woggle's Arguments:
>
> I judge CFJ 3086 FALSE. Agora's players are capable of receiving
> messages from the fora, and Agora is capable of sending messages to
> Agoran fora via the mechanisms by which it can act (e.g. via proposal
> passing an appropriate rule directing the message to be sent on its
> behalf). Agora's internal decision-making processes which might cause
> it to participate it in the fora are considerably more cumbersome than
> a typical player's, but this internal fault does not implicate R101.
If there were a rule that stated "Woggle CANNOT legally post messages
on eir own behalf; only the passage a proposal containing eir message
CAN do so" wouldn't you feel that your right to participate was being
infringed upon?
