On 08/15/2011 06:12 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 18:08, Sean Hunt <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:00, Aaron Goldfein <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> I agree with scshunt's arguments. Destroying the points all at once is >>> permitted by the rules, even if it is a mistake in the rules. Trying to >>> catch him on some other issue that the courts already DISMISSED in order >> to >>> make-up for him cleverly circumventing the rules does not seem >> appropriate. >>> I opine OVERRULE/NOT GUILTY. >> >> I don't see how NOT GUILTY is appropriate. I clearly did violate the rule. >> >> -scshunt >> > > But judgement was already reached on a similar case.
On substantially the same infraction? (The obvious alternative is GUILTY/DISCHARGE, so it's only a formality, not a question of substance.)
