Does Agora have any jurisdiction over a laptop repair shop? How would
they respond if we (or rather, the speaker, on behalf of the
President, on behalf of Agora) mailed them a letter fining them, say,
10 points?

Can we try this?

On 8 August 2011 16:52, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3085
>
> ==============================  CFJ 3085  ==============================
>
>    The repair shop mentioned in the evidence violated Rule 101(v)
>    by detaining Roujo's laptop
>
> ========================================================================
>
> Caller:                                 Bucky
>
> Judge:                                  Murphy
> Judgement:
>
> ========================================================================
>
> History:
>
> Called by Bucky:                        07 Aug 2011 20:09:39 GMT
> Assigned to Murphy:                     (as of this message)
>
> ========================================================================
>
> Caller's Evidence:
>
> From: Jonathan Rouillard <jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com>
> To: "agora-busin...@agoranomic.org" <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org>
> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2011 4:11 PM
> Subject: BUS: Yay! My laptop is back!
>
>
> If there is any pending intention to make me inactive, I object to it. I
> just
> got my laptop back from the repair shop, so I'm back in the game! =)
> ~ Roujo
>
> ========================================================================
>
> Gratuitous Arguments by Roujo:
>
> I still followed the game from my Android phone, it was
> just a lot more difficult to do so.
>
> ========================================================================
>
> Gratuitous Arguments by Tanner L. Swett:
>
> given the nature of a repair shop, it is likely that Roujo
> surrendered eir laptop voluntarily. However, the repair shop may have
> failed to repair the laptop in a timely fashion (on purpose or not),
> or, having repaired the laptop, they could have failed to return it in
> a timely fashion. Whether or not one of these would have violated
> Roujo's rights (had e not been able to participate in the fora via eir
> phone) is an open question.
>
> ========================================================================
>

Reply via email to