On 31 July 2011 02:44, Pavitra <[email protected]> wrote: > A person's exposure to this rule is eir own choice. It's not "14", it's > "the lesser of 14 or whatever you feel like". The only exception is in > the case of a scam, in which case I would expect the courts to rule > DISCHARGE, unless the courts are corrupted by the scam, in which case it > doesn't matter what the rules say because they can EXILE you for failing > to purchase a fish license.
Fair enough. Still, "you don't _have_ to agree" seems an inadequate justification; consider something as popular and central as the AAA (perhaps coupled with a bank): a choice between exposing yourself to the possibility of unreasonable punishment and barely playing the game at all doesn't seem just.
