On 07/26/2011 06:59 PM, omd wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Then I do so without resolving the intent. >>> >>> n.b. "without resolving the intent" is meaningless >> >> No it isn't, it clearly means "I do so by announcement (by virtue of >> being the defendant) rather than doing it With 2 Support". > > But "you can do X with two support" means "if you have two support, > you can do X by announcement". Two rules allowing em to do X by > announcement are interchangeable.
That quibble only applies to the rephrasing, not the original message.
