omd wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Charles Walker > <charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If a player violates a Rule by failing to meet the requirements >> of an office, such as performing eir weekly or monthly duties, >> then the IADoP SHALL initiate a valid criminal case on the >> matter as soon as possible afterwards. Cases initiated in this >> manner do not count towards the IADoP's excess case limit, Rules >> to the contrary notwithstanding. > > This will cause a lot of frivolous cases.
Nothing prevents the IADoP from retracting a case after e initiates it, but still, yes, there's enough churn with CotC as it is. (I'll likely get everything caught up on Saturday.)
