ehird wrote:

> On 2 June 2011 06:16, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Does it really (asks the Assessor, expecting the unexpected)?
> 
> I vote AGAINT proposal 7068.

As usual, this is deemed ineffective.

For Droowl's benefit, misspellings are generally covered by
Rule 754 (1), but "AGAINT" is a special case due to its deliberate
misuse in a scam:
  http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1260
  http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1261

Reply via email to