On Sun, 22 May 2011, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 11-05-22 10:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Now, see, if NoV's still existed, I could contest it, point out > > > that you missed it, and it would be resolved without issue. See? > > > > And TTPF: > > > > Defendant's statement: Mea culpa; I humbly request Apology as they tend to > > be slightly More Interesting than other current punishments. -G. > > I did not intend to punish anyone who had published a report after my last > one, so I initiate a criminal case accusing myself of violating Rule 2143 by > inaccurately publishing in my most recent IADoP's report that the Herald's > most recent report was not published on May 17, 2011.
Occurred to me after I sent the earlier: you can just retract criminal case (or now both of them). Even if you don't retract: I did miss April, I don't mind doing an apology, and I think it's a bad precedent to punish a recordkeepor for a simple missing-a-message error. -G.
