On Wed, 18 May 2011, Ed Murphy wrote: > omd wrote: > > > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Proposal 7032 (AI=3) by omd > >> Flexibility (fixed) > >> > >> Amend Rule 683 (Voting on Agoran Decisions) by replacing "one" with "two". > > > > This amendment modifies two clauses; the unexpected one is this (sigh): > > > > An eligible voter on a particular Agoran decision submits a > > ballot to the vote collector by publishing a valid notice > > indicating which two of the available options e selects. To be > > As (a) the voting limit is two and (b) this has been brought to light, > I'll generally interpret votes as selecting the same option twice.
That doesn't quite work, as it's pretty clear that submitting one valid ballot requires naming the two options. For example "I cast one ballot FOR/AGAINST".
