scshunt wrote: > On 05/05/11 18:08, Ed Murphy wrote: >> You just judged that the promise was uncashable. I don't think >> that omd's use of "caching" instead of "cashing" matters, nor >> do I see any other implicit loopholes in the issue. > > You're confusing the promises; the one I judged was ais523.
Ah, so I was. For reference, here's the message in which omd created the promise: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2011-April/028207.html
