On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Elliott Hird <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 13 April 2011 06:20, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Is there really enough ambiguity here for this CFJ to be warranted? >> It seems more valid than most of my attempts. > > It's not *my* fault if someone registers in an uninteresting manner.
Proto: In R869, replace "reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously" with "reasonably unclearly and reasonably ambiguously".