On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 15:44, Sean Hunt <scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> > Proposal: Far, Far Too Lazy (AI=2, II=0)
> > {{{
> > Enact a new power-2 rule reading "As soon as this rule is enacted, Yally
> > becomes inactive. Yally CANNOT, rules to the contrary notwithstanding,
> > become active. If this rule has existed for more than 21 days, any player
> > CAN by announcement cause it to repeal itself."
> > }}}
> >
> > -scshunt
>
> Come on now. That's no fun at all.
Yeah.
I would suggest a different approach (for Yally, keeping it "fun"):
1. Propose the fixes (SHOULD NOT -> CANNOT and EXILE).
2. Call for Appeal on my (Judge G.'s) 14-day suspension, looking for REMAND.
3. NoV and CFJ on Yally's breach of my 14-day suspension, a separate offense.
With some help of the judges, by the time (2) and (3) go through the courts,
(1) should be in place to allow for two generally less-escapable punishments.
It would require some slightly longer attention span than Agora tends to
have for punishments, but it would be more by-the-book. May raise some
ex post facto issues about CFJ timing but, as I said, that sort of thing
isn't forbidden and is after all "fun" to explore.
-G.
