On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote: > On 6 April 2011 17:40, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > >>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2985 > >>> ========================= Criminal Case 2985 ========================= > >>> > >>> Yally violated Rule 1504 (a Power 2 Rule) by becoming active > >>> during eir timeout period. > >>> > >>> ======================================================================== > >> > >> This amounted to a willful and egregious breach of eir previous > >> punishment. GUILTY/TIME-OUT (14 days). > > > > I intend, with 2 support, to call for reconsideration of this. Are > > you sure e actually noticed that the judgement was affirmed? You, for > > example, didn't. > > Well, e definitely knew when e did this: > http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg21614.html
I apologize; I should have noted in the judgement that I took that latter email into account as proof of intent to flaunt the punishment (as opposed to ignorance). -G.
