On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:15 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> omd wrote: >> >>> The AFO registers. >> >> CoE: First, it terminated when contracts were repealed (the arguments >> in CFJ 2761 apply equally to the third paragraph of Rule 1586). Second, >> even if it didn't, Agora now requires Agoran consent for it to register. > > I'd argue about whether individual contracts were "defined" by Rule > 1742, but it's moot until people stop objecting to registration > intents. :)
I think receiving Agoran Consent to register is prima facie evidence of still existing. It means a majority of interested players are fine with its existence and participation in Agora. —Tanner L. Swett
