On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Charles Walker wrote: > On 29 March 2011 20:29, Charles Walker <charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I publish a NoV accusing Wooble of breaking Rule 2158, a power 2 Rule, > > by failing to judge case 2979 within the time limit. > > I publish a NoV accusing omd of breaking Rule 2158, a power 2 Rule, by > > failing to judge case 2980 within the time limit. > > These are both wrong - I retract them and apologise. Not sure how they > slipped through the net.
You can't retract the NoVs. These NoVs are currently Contested due to the court cases you raised (the above message was ambiguous in retracting the court cases IMO). You can retract the court cases, in which case the NoVs remain Contested. Which is fine; Contested NoVs are considered "on hold" unless someone raises another court case about them. (This is all [mostly] by design). -G.
