Wooble wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
>> Gratuitous: Rule 2226 defines judicial rank as a player switch. Rule
>> 2162 says "No other entity possesses an instance of that switch". If
>> you deregistered, then you became an "other entity" and thus ceased to
>> possess an instance of the judicial-rank switch. FALSE.
>
> Yet you contniue to pretend that agora-business and agora-official
> possessed instances of a switch switched to "Public" before such a
> thing even became possible.
*looks up*
February 2003: Proposal 4456 defines switches and assigns fora a
Publicity switch, including this clause:
Whenever a switch is created, or becomes associated with a class
of entities, then each entity in the class that had previously
been in a state that is now a state of the switch shall continue
to be in that state; all other entities in the class shall be in
the default state of the switch.
August 2006: Proposal 4866 repeals switches and amends Publicity to
just be an attribute defined by the Fora rule.
August 2007: Proposal 5111 defines switches and switchifies Publicity
again, with continuity implicitly covered by Rule 1586 (Definition and
Continuity of Entities), which no one appeared to question at the time.
