omd wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Logic: >> 1. Â An Instrument explicitly CANNOT make changes > power (R2140); >> 2. Â Exceptio probat regulam; therefore an instrument generally CAN make >> changes =< power. >> [Note: I admit it's arguable and therefore safer to a scam to use the rule.] > > I really don't think this would be held up. > > 1. Once an Agoran decision has been resolved, its outcome CANNOT be > changed in any way. > 2. Exception probat regulam; therefore before an Agoran decision has > been resolved, its outcome CAN be changed by announcement. > > 1. A document-defined entity's name CANNOT be changed to be the same > as another document-defined entity's name. > 2. Therefore an non-document-defined entity CAN have its name changed > to be the same as a document-defined entity's name by announcement.
Rules and proposals do what they say when they (take / are taking) effect. So when is G. effective?
