On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Wooble wrote: > >> In the election for CotC, there is only one valid option, Murphy. The >> office becomes Postulated if for some reason it wasn't (e claimed to >> assume it a while ago, but I can't find any message purporting to >> remove em from it or make is Assumed, so this probably does nothing.) > > Depends on CFJ 2951 (which I think is TRUE because the natural parsing > of "any officer can resign, vacating the office" is "for each office, > its holder can resign, vacating it").
For Assessor, yes. As I said, I didn't see a message even *purporting* to resign CotC, although it's possible I just missed it.
