On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Another obligatory CFJ, disqualifying omd:
> * Removing a decision's adoption index does not count as "changing" it
> for the purpose of Rule 106, and thus cannot be done except by
> taking precedence over Rule 106.
Gratuitous: If removing the adoption index does not count as
"changing" it, I don't see how Rule 106 would block it. The only
other relevant text is:
The adoption index of this decision is set to the adoption index
of the proposal at the initiation of the decision.
which clearly does not keep any authority over the AI after the
initiation of the decision.
