On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > I intend, with two support, to appeal this judgment. There is no text in the > wording of the rule to support this interpretation -
I object; I think the interpretation can be read into the rule because of the term "opinion". It's not generally possible for a person to have multiple valid opinions, either in a legal or ordinary-language context.
