On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:11 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, that makes more sense. However, I disagree with you: "the current > judge of CFJ 2908" is part of the gamestate; it can be ratified to be > you irrespective of whether Murphy actually succeeded in assigning it > to you when e purported to.
This ambiguity is why I called a CFJ on whether I'm the judge. However, if I was the judge, my judgement was getting increasingly late so I felt it prudent to attempt to assign a judgement.
