On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 01:18:28 -0700, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> 6863 O 1 2.0 coppro Be Exact > AGAINST, announcing the amount should be SHALL >> 6864 O 1 3.0 coppro Urgency simplified > already failed quorum (the down side of urgent proposals is that they > can fail quorum faster)
This proposal was urgent? I don't remember that. Did you maybe just think that because the name includes 'urgency'? Sean
