On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Ed Murphy wrote: > G. wrote: > > > Therefore, in light of this complete silence, I use the powers granted > > me by R217, and state that it is (a) for the good of the game; (b) in > > keeping with game custom; and (c) in keeping with the primacy of R754(2) > > definitional clauses (if "definitions" are extended to "descriptions"), > > to assume, prima facie, that when a document defers to other descriptions > > without stating a location for the descriptions, or while stating > > "elsewhere", that said locations must occur within the same document > > unless the document explicitly delagates description abilities to some > > other entity. In this case, the Rule doesn't. > > Are you treating the ruleset as a single document?
I generally was; is there something that contradicts this? -G.
