On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Draft 2: Motions to Reconsider
>
> If a non-Appeals judicial question has a judgement in effect, that
> has been in effect for less than seven days, has not been appealed,
> and has not had a Motion to Reconsider filed for it at any time
> while it has been assigned to its current judge, then any player
> CAN file a Motion to Reconsider the question with 2 Support.
>
> When a Motion to Reconsider is so filed, the question's judgement
^^^^^^^^^
> is rendered open again. A player who files such a Motion SHOULD
> include arguments as to why the the question needs reconsideration,
> and such arguments become a part of the record of the case.
Oops.
Draft 2.1: s/"question's judgement is rendered"/"question is rendered"
