On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 16:34 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > The document declared its own name in its content, so that is its name > to itself. I readily admit that this does not *absolutely guarantee* > that it has that name in Agoran Legal Practice. However, we have > accepted almost every self-named document in the past in this way, so > precedents are at least reasonable that it does. At least as strong > as the more weakly-regulated player nickname (really, the only place > "nickname" appears in the ruleset at all is where it forbids you from > doing what you did).
I seem to remember costanza agreeing to a public contract that said eir name was costanza, just to prevent people getting confused about who e was. -- ais523
