On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 May 2010 14:34, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn >> <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Okay, I come off hold. Maybe just until I'm out of office, but maybe longer. >> >> You weren't on hold. If you had been, you wouldn't have been eligible >> to be Speaker at all. >> >> However, it's fairly unlikely you're actually Speaker despite being active. >> > I think I was. > http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2010-May/025540.html
Ok, that got missed in my trying to catch up on 3 weeks of stuff since the previous Registrar's report. If I read R2139 correctly, the Activity reporting on the report is not self-ratifying, so you were inactive and you're neither the Speaker nor on the Succession List. I'm increasingly less certain of who the actual Speaker is, although I believe it's still fairly likely to be allispaul, until the pending intent to make em inactive is resolved. Would anyone at this point vote against making the tiebreaker for choosing the Speaker favor people who have been registered longer? Not that wins by people who aren't paying attention at all should be the norm.
