On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 19:18 -0400, comex wrote: > Proposal: Effect cleanup (AI=3, Distributable via fee) > > Amend Rule 106 by removing: > > This rule takes > precedence over any rule which would permit a proposal to take > effect. > > and: > > It does not > otherwise take effect. > > and by adding the following paragraph before the last paragraph: > > A proposal with a decision on which the option selected by Agora > is not ADOPTED does not take effect, rules to the contrary > notwithstanding. > > [Clarify what "it" is, and deseparate those clauses.]
So proposals can take effect before people start voting on them, if a low-power rule says they can? You should require the presence of an ADOPTED decision, not just veto the presence of a non-ADOPTED decision. -- ais523
