On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 18:07 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
> None of the rest of this email should be construed as agreeing to any
> agreements, the rest of this email notwithstanding.
>
> Unlike the scam in part 1, I [at least I think it was I] discovered
> this scam when it was still viable. I didn't understand relative
> currency worths, so I talked about it with ais523. As far as I know, e
> never acted on it.
>
> I agree to the following public pledge:
>
>
> {
> This is a public pledge called Fair Trade. Only Sgeo and $VICTIM may
> agree to this pledge. Upon joining, $VICTIM CAN and SHALL give X units
> of currency X to Sgeo. 1 week after this is done, $VICTIM CAN and MAY,
> by announcement, act on behalf of Sgeo to cause Sgeo to give $VICTIM Y
> units of currency Y.
> }
>
> *$VICTIM gives Sgeo currency X.*
>
> As Fair Trade is obsolete, I terminate it.
I never found a decent opportunity to pull this one, nor a victim that I
felt comfortable pulling it on. (I wouldn't have interfered if Sgeo
tried it, by the way.)
--
ais523
