Sorry, my lurking on agora-dis has been very minimal for the last several years. Did the concept get exhausted internally as amusing, or for lack of external customers wanting to name Agora as the jurisdiction of disputes in contracts? I'm quite willing to believe that I'm the only individual on Earth with that particular streak of insanity.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > You just missed the end of an era. From 2007 until last week, Agora (to > greater or lesser extents over that time) recognized outside Contracts > (including a type called a Partnership) that applied to be governed by > Agoran Equity Law. Partnerships fitting certain criteria, in fact, > were considered to be persons. > > That was all just repealed. Currently, Agora does not so recognize any, > and since we just repealed it all because of general exhaustion of the > concept, it's likely to not happen again soon. > > I was definitely thinking of you back in 2007 when working on putting > some of this in place; somehow I thought you were lurking so apologize > for not bringing it to your attention directly. > > -G.
