On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> I would think that fact that this could refer to either a major arcana >> card or an exploit card means the conditional doesn't work. Even if e >> doesn't have both cards, we have to evaluate the conditional as if e >> possibly did (am I saying that clearly?). -G. > > In other words, if you say "If I have (a OR b) I do (a OR b)" you're not > distinguishing in words whether you're doing a versus b, even if you can > only do one of them at any particular time.
He said "playing a card if necessary"; if he has the major arcana card, he wouldn't need to play a card to veto. -- -c.
