c. wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>> Whups, ignore that! Wrong proposal. So my other question: the CFJs didn't
>> explicitly CoE on prop 6583, which is required to stop self-ratification, so
>> did it self-ratify or was there a CoE? In case: CoE: the voting results
>> for proposal 6583 were incorrect.
>
> coppro's CoE was never accepted or denied, but Murphy said
>
>> I thought about that after publishing results, when I caught up to your
>> Extra Vote withdrawal, but kept quiet because I thought it would make
>> 6583 pass. Taking c. into account as well, 6583 would still fail, and
>> so would 6589 (even if G.'s Kill Bill failed).
>
> so I guess it doesn't matter?
That sounds right, I'll double-check later today probably.
Tangentially related proto: Amend Rule 2201 (Self-Ratification)
by replacing this text:
b) A claim of error, appropriate for matters of fact. The
publisher of the original document SHALL as soon as possible
either deny the claim (causing it to cease to be a doubt) or
publish a revision.
with this text:
b) A claim of error, appropriate for matters of fact. The
publisher of the original document SHALL as soon as possible
either deny the claim (causing it to cease to be a doubt),
publish a revision, or (if the subject is actually a matter
of law) initiate an inquiry case regarding the truth of the
claim.
