On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Don't c.'s judgements of 2755-56 imply that Crumbling Fountain > passed after all?
Do they? (For what it's worth, I didn't remember that those cases had anything to do with my proposal when I judged them.) -- -c.
