On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:29 AM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 12:44 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > What if you just let the author distribute an urgent proposal? As it > is, the > > > urgent proposal requires two more Distrib-u-Matics and only says that > the > > > Promotor SHOULD distribute it in four days. > > > > I'm open to the idea, but when I previously (a long while ago) suggested > > that persons should be allowed to distribute their own proposals at > > times, the general opinion was "chaos in ID numbers, vote collection, > > mistaken distributions that are canceled because a required parameter > > was missing, proposal pool, etc." Other opinions on this? (or > suggestions > > on a middle ground... I'm uncomfortable giving any officer a SHALL<=4 > days). > > You might be able to make a CAN that nevertheless allows deputisation > despite not being a SHALL. That would avoid most of the problems with > letting just anyone do it out-of-turn, I expect; deputisations are > likely to be scrutinised as it is. > > -- > ais523 > Well, the use of Urgent proposals is likely to be so rare that everyone will scrutinize over them anyway.
