Normally, I would commend the lack of arguments for such a stupid CFJ
(no offense ais523), but I suppose coppro should at least explain eir
reversal.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 28, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2728
=================== CFJ 2728 (Interest Index = 1)
====================
G. has opined REASSIGN on CFJ 2696a.
===
===
==================================================================
TRUE.
-coppro
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. For a contested
issue (in which the panel did not agree), you would think coppro would
at least give some arguments.
