On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Doesn't need to be Power>1 IMO.
I really hate having that kind of rule power-1. I still give credence to the argument that conditional votes never worked because R2127's definition of 'clearly specified' is unreasonable, and its power is too low to override other rules... even if it does, it's a mess. Let it have appropriate power. -- -c.
