On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe at the time of this distribution my voting limit was 1 (2 by > caste, but I had 4 rests) > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 20:13, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: >> NUM II AI SUBMITTER TITLE >> 6533 0 1.0 BobTHJ Periodic Election Anarchy > FOR >> 6534 0 2.0 BobTHJ Audit Card Destruction Cleanup > FOR >> 6535 1 2.0 Murphy Workaround for broken time limits > FOR >> 6536 1 2.0 Murphy Prevent double appeal of criminal ... > FOR >> 6537 0 1.0 Walker R2215 Fix > PRESENT >> 6538 0 1.0 coppro Coauthor rewards > FOR >> 6539 3 2.0 coppro Dealing Refactor > AGAINST, I like the consolidation of the card offices, however I > dislike assinging tracked deals to various other offices. Why not just > consolidate the whole thing under one office? Change this and I'll > vote for it.
Because of convenience. The IADoP already reports on office holders and IIs and resolves elections. The Assessor resolves proposals. The CotC, though e's not required to do so, reports on every judgment made. It makes sense that they provide the pragmatic list of deals owed. -coppro
