On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:48 AM, ais523 <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 09:44 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote: >> Proposal: Trophy Repeal (AI=3, II=1) >> {{ >> Repeal Rule 2105. >> Repeal Rule 2029. >> }} >> >> Proposal: Guaranteed to Fail (AI=3, II=1) >> {{ >> Repeal Rule 104. >> }} >> >> Proposal: Guaranteed to Pass (AI=3, II=1) >> {{ >> Increase the Power of Rule 104 to 4. >> }} >> >> Proposal: Cruel and Unusual Punishment (AI=1, II=1) >> {{ >> WHEREAS the Ruleset is so long that forcing someone to read it would >> be a cruel and unusual punishment, >> >> BE IT HEREBY PROCLAIMED that Rule 2247 be repealed. >> }} >> >> Proposal: Punishment Shmunishment (AI=2, II=1) >> {{ >> Repeal Rule 2228. >> Repeal Rule 2229. >> Remove the second-to-last paragraph of Rule 2230. >> Remove, from Rule 1504, the bullet for SILENCE and the last sentence. >> Repeal Rule 2259. >> Remove, from Rule 2262, the bullets for Absolv-o-Matic, Stool Pigeon, >> and Penalty Box. >> Remove, from Rule 2272, the last bullet. >> [This still leaves sufficient mechanism to deal with problem players >> through the criminal courts, in my view, until an alternate form of >> punishment is devised. >> Rests are past their prime in any case.] >> }} >> >> I intend, without 3 objections, to make each of these proposals >> Distributable. > > I object to all of them. I'm not convinced you're entirely serious > here...
The all are except the R104 ones - I decided to propose to repeal it, realized it would fail, and made the other one as a joke. -coppro
