On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 16:54, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: > comex wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Note that I'm not advocating removing penalties for mis-performing or >>> non-performing officers. They need to be retained for cases of gross >>> negligence in repeatedly ignoring duties even after becoming aware of >>> the issue. However, simply because a method exists to penalize an >>> officer does not mean it should be used. >> >> >> Yeah, these NoVs are ridiculous. I helped out but I'm not really sure >> what the point was... >> > I'll disclaim that I did not intend BobTHJ to get a significant penalty for > more than maybe one or two... largely, I was just interested in what the > result would be. > > Also, I would not have any issues with someone issuing NoVs for my failures > as Grand Poobah after the installation of Cards - I was unprepared for the > recordkeeping, and that's my responsibility. Nor would I be upset at someone > NoVing me for something else. > My point is this: If we saddle officers with hefty fines for minor infractions, then who's going to want to go through the work of being an officer?
BobTHJ
