Ed Murphy wrote: > I recuse Pavitra from CFJs 2704 and 2706 and make em supine.
Sorry about that, everyone.
I might as well post my incomplete attempt at working through 2706:
========================================================================
I accept the arguments by ehird and G. to the effect that there is only
one form of deregistration, and that the hard/soft distinction is an
unfortunate judicial fiction with no basis in the rules.
Murphy correctly points out that Rule 2150 expressly defines (most)
former players as persons, at Power 3:
Any biological organism that is generally capable of
communicating by email in English (including via a translation
service) is a person.
The question then is: does the text of Rule 101(vii) _conflict_ with the
definition in Rule 2150, in the strong R1030 sense?
The controversial text reads as follows:
vii. Every player has the right to deregister rather than
continue to play.
The difficult points are the definitions of "rather than" and "play".
========================================================================
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
