On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:34, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Address: what if the auditing entity is a non-person? > > A non-person shouldn't be able to hold one of the Dealor offices or > take an action such as playing a Penalty Box card. If it can, that's > a bug. > Irrelevant. The audit rule specifically attempts to address what would occur if there is no auditing entity (and by this we can only infer that the author's intent was non-person entity). Since it would be impossible for the Accountor to perform destruction at the same instant a non-person entity or non-entity initiates an audit, the rule text suggests that the audit creates an obligation for future card destruction (one without a time limit).
BobTHJ
