On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Voting results for Proposals 6502 - 6513:
>
> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
> Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).]
>
> x6502 D1 2.0 Yally Creative Offices
> *6503 D0 2.0 G. fix ancient cards
> *6504 O1 1.0 Murphy We don't need this exception
> x6505 D1 2.0 Pavitra Sensible Salary Switch
> *6506 D1 2.0 Pavitra No Vacancy v.3
> x6507 D3 2.0 Walker Card Rewrite
> *6508 O1 1.0 Murphy Fix contest limits
> x6509 D2 3.0 Walker Fix the Senate
> *6510 D1 2.0 Murphy Judicial fixes
> x6511 O1 1.0 ais523 Fix point awards
> *6512 D0 3.0 c. Fix dependent actions
> *6513 D0 3.0 coppro Power Cleanup
>
> 6502 6503 6504 6505 6506 6507 6508 6509 6510 6511
>
> ais523 P F F A P A F P P F
> BobTHJ A P A P A P P
> coppro A A F P A A F A F F
> Murphy P F F P P P F A A A
> Pavitra F F F F F P F P F P
> Walker A F 3F F F F 3F F F 3A
> Wooble A P F P F A F A F P
>
> AI 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 1
> VI 0.25 4 *U* 1 3 0.25 *U* 0.3+ 4 0.5
> F/A 1/4 4/1 8/0 2/2 3/1 1/4 8/0 1/3 4/1 2/4
>
> Quorum 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
> Voters 7 7 6 7 7 7 6 7 7 6
>
> 6512 6513
>
> ais523 F F
> BobTHJ P P
> coppro P F
> Murphy F F
> Pavitra P P
> Walker F F
> Wooble P P
>
> AI 3 3
> VI *U* *U*
> F/A 3/0 4/0
>
> Quorum 5 5
> Voters 7 7
>
>
> Text of adopted proposals:
>
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 6503 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=0) by G.
> fix ancient cards
>
> Amend Rule 2262 (The Deck of Justice) by replacing:
> * Discard Picking - Indicate a card that was played or
> destroyed in the past 72 hours. It is
> transferred to your hand.
> with:
> * Discard Picking - Indicate a card that was played or
> destroyed in the past 72 hours. It is
> created in your hand.
Fails, the relevant text was amended by
>
> Amend Rule 2261 (The Deck of Change) by replacing the word "discard"
> with "destroy" where it appears in the rule.
>
>
> Amend Rule 2260 (The Deck of Government) by replacing "Vote Power"
> with "voting limit" where it appears in the rule.
>
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 6504 (Ordinary, AI=1.0, Interest=1) by Murphy
> We don't need this exception
>
> Amend Rule 2168 (Extending the voting period) by removing the text
> "and the vote collector".
>
> [If e wants to resolve an unpopular proposal during the second week,
> despite having voted FOR it emself, then e can retract eir vote first.]
>
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 6506 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Pavitra
> No Vacancy v.3
>
> If a Rule titled "Assumption of Vacant Offices" exists, then amend it by
> replacing its entire text with the following {}-delimited text;
> otherwise, create a new Power-2 rule, "Assumption of Vacant Offices",
> with the following {}-delimited text:
> {
> Assumption is an elected office switch with values Postulated
> (default) and Assumed. Changes to Assumption are secured.
>
> An active first-class player can make emself the holder of an
> elected office by announcement, provided that both
>
> (1) the office is either vacant or Assumed, and
>
> (2) there is no election for that office currently in progress.
>
> Upon doing so, the office's Assumption is flipped to Assumed.
>
> When the holder of an office ceases to be an active player, the
> office's Assumption is flipped to Assumed.
>
> When a person comes to hold an office, or would come to hold an
> office if e did not hold it already, by a means other than the
> one provided by this Rule, then the Assumption of that office is
> flipped to Postulated.
> }
>
> Amend Rule 2255 (Major Arcana) by replacing "vacant" with "vacant or
> Assumed".
>
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 6508 (Ordinary, AI=1.0, Interest=1) by Murphy
> Fix contest limits
>
> Amend Rule 2233 (Awarding and Revoking Points) by replacing the
> second paragraph with this text:
>
> The contestmaster of a contest CAN and SHALL award and revoke
> points as directed by that contract, except that e CANNOT
> thus cause either the total number awarded or the total number
> revoked on any axis due to that contest in a given week to
> exceed that contest's threshold index.
>
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 6510 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Murphy
> Judicial fixes
>
> Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by replacing this text:
>
> The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial
> case are the active players,
>
> with this text:
>
> The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial
> case are the active players who have not previously been
> assigned as its judge,
>
> Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by replacing this text:
>
> The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of an appeal case
> are the judicial panels consisting of max(3,1+2*R) members
> (where R is the rank of the prior case), where each of the
> members is qualified to be assigned as judge of the prior case
> and none of the members is the prior judge.
>
> with this text:
>
> The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of an appeal case
> are the judicial panels consisting of max(3,1+2*R) members
> (where R is the rank of the prior case), where each of the
> members is qualified to be assigned as judge of the prior case
> (or, if this would result in no panels being qualified, then
> where each of the members would be qualified to be assigned as
> judge of the prior case if e was Supreme).
>
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 6512 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=0) by c.
> Fix dependent actions
>
> Replace the first paragraph of Rule 1728 with:
> A rule or contract which purports to allow a person (the
> performer) to perform an action by a set of one or more of the
> following methods (N is 1 unless otherwise specified):
>
> and, in Rule 1728, replace "if and only if" with "if".
>
> Replace the first two paragraphs of Rule 2124 with:
>
> A Supporter of a dependent action is an eligible entity who has
> publicly posted (and not withdrawn) support (syn. "consent") for
> an announcement of intent to perform the action. An Objector to
> a dependent action is an eligible entity who has publicly posted
> (and not withdrawn) an objection to the announcement of intent
> to perform the action.
>
> The entities eligible to support or object to a dependent action
> are, by default, all first-class players, subject to
> modification by the document authorizing the dependent action.
> However, the previous sentence notwithstanding, the Executor of
> the announcement of intent is not eligible to support it.
>
> Change the Power of Rule 2124 to 3. (May as well fix the power
> escalation while we're at it.)
>
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 6513 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=0) by coppro
> Power Cleanup
>
> Replace the text of R1688 with the following:
> The Power of an entity is a non-negative rational number.
> An Instrument is an entity with positive Power.
>
> The Power of an entity cannot be set or modified except as
> stipulated by the Rules. All entities have Power zero except
> where specifically allowed by the rules.
>
> A Rule that secures a change, action, or value (hereafter the
> securing Rule) thereby makes it IMPOSSIBLE to perform that change
> or action, or to modify that value, except as allowed by an
> Instrument with Power greater than or equal to the change's Power
> Threshold. This Threshold defaults to the securing Rule's Power,
> but CAN be lowered as allowed by that Rule (including by the Rule
> itself).
>
--
-c.
