2009/10/3 Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com>: > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Perhaps a winning condition should be having won the game in each >> > currently >> > recognized way. >> >> Paradox, you can't satisfy that winning condition without satisfying it >> first. > > Except for that one. > I would think it absolutely hilarious to have such a rule without taking that precaution. Why would it have to ever be satisfied?
-- -Tiger
