On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 09:40 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:19, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Having received no objections, I make all the quoted players inactive. > > > And here I thought I was the only one who believed dependent actions > were not broken.
A proposal just passed to revert the wording of the rule in question to the old, correctly working, version. -- ais523
