Wait, what? Why not REMAND?
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 16, 2009, at 5:26 AM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:20 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/9/16 Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com>:
coppro wrote:
I assign myself as judge to CFJ 2679, and I judge it FALSE.
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal. The arguments indicate that
the transfer failed, but the statement is "ais523 owns a Dunce Cap
card" which should have been judged TRUE. I recommend REASSIGN,
as coppro presumably just mis-remembered the statement as "ais523
transferred a Dunce Cap card" or something similar.
I support.
I support and do so. Good arguments, but they don't match the
judgement.
(Recommend REASSIGN to coppro so e can fix them.)
--
ais523
