comex wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2664 >> >> =================== CFJ 2664 (Interest Index = 2) ==================== >> >> The Ambassador has a weekly report >> >> ======================================================================== >> >> Caller: BobTHJ >> >> Judge: c. >> Judgement: >> >> ======================================================================== >> >> Caller's Arguments: >> >> The Ambassador is required to track Recognition, a switch. All >> switches must be reported weekly per R2143, since R2162 doesn't >> specify weekly or monthly tracking. >> >> ======================================================================== > > Is there anyone who think this should not be TRUE?
I think it is, but should not be. As I wrote back in March: >> 6175 D 1 2.0 Yally All Offices Are Important > AGAINST (we used to define weekly/monthly by duty rather than office, > leading to low-priority duties being required weekly because we forgot > to add "monthly") Ambassador is a good candidate for low priority. Consider its duties: R2135 monthly R2185 weekly, but probably doesn't need to be R2251 variable but mostly infrequent R2147 monthly R2159 variable but mostly infrequent
